Which of the following statements about Cutter vs. Powell is true?

A. Implied terms in a contract take precedence over written ones.
B. Partial performance always leads to partial pay-outs.
C. Powell was held liable to pay Mr. Cutter's salary to Mrs. Cutter.
D. Written contract terms supersede implied terms.

In Cutter vs. Powell, written contract terms prevail over implied terms, Mr. Powell was not liable to pay Mr. Cutter's salary to Mrs. Cutter, and in contract law, written terms generally take precedence.

Explanation:

Written contract terms supersede implied terms is the true statement regarding Cutter vs. Powell.

In the case of Cutter vs. Powell, the court held that Mr. Powell was not liable to pay Mr. Cutter's salary to Mrs. Cutter as it was not a valid claim.

Implied terms can supplement written contract terms, but written terms generally take precedence over implied ones in contract law.

Learn more about Cutter vs. Powell contract law here:

https://brainly.com/question/51380693