Question 8 (7 points)

Which of these actions would have fit in with the approach to change advocated by mainstream Civil Rights leaders?

A. Moving out of a racist community
B. Sabotaging the equipment of a racist employer
C. Occupying a federal building until segregation is ended
D. Going on a hunger strike to raise awareness about racial injustice



Answer :

Final answer:

Mainstream Civil Rights leaders advocated for nonviolent and strategic approaches to drive change. Moving out of a racist community aligns with their peaceful strategies, while actions like sabotage or violent occupation do not.


Explanation:

Moving out of a racist community aligns with the approach advocated by mainstream Civil Rights leaders. This action represents a peaceful and proactive way to distance oneself from oppressive environments and work towards personal empowerment.

Sabotaging the equipment of a racist employer and occupying a federal building until segregation is ended are actions that do not align with the nonviolent and strategic approaches favored by mainstream Civil Rights leaders.

Going on a hunger strike to raise awareness about racial injustice is a peaceful and impactful method that has been historically used by civil rights activists to draw attention to social issues and initiate change.


Learn more about Civil Rights Movement here:

https://brainly.com/question/16092239