The essay discusses tensions between immigrants and the US, defines rhetoric as adaptable communication, and advocates for a nomadic existence.
Central Claim: Michael Lechuga asserts that tensions between Latinas/o/x immigrants and the US come in various forms, emphasizing national identity, migrant identity, and fear associated with criminality. The essay delves into how the migrant vernacular needs to be understood to navigate the impacts of rigid state borders on identity.
Definition of Rhetoric: Rhetoric, according to the author, is an art of communication that surpasses monocultural thinking and embraces adaptability. It is portrayed as a versatile tool that goes beyond language to encompass thought, action, and connection.
Key Contribution: Lechuga's essay sheds light on the fundamental right of immigration, challenges nationalist views, and advocates for a nomadic existence that transcends borders and embraces varied forms of nomadism.
https://brainly.com/question/42439908