Question 9 of 10

A survey asked students whether they have any siblings and pets. The survey data are shown in the relative frequency table.

[tex]\[
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
\hline & Siblings & No siblings & Total \\
\hline Pets & 0.3 & 0.15 & 0.45 \\
\hline No pets & 0.45 & 0.1 & 0.55 \\
\hline Total & 0.75 & 0.25 & 1.0 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\][/tex]

Given that a student has a sibling, what is the likelihood that he or she does not have a pet?

A. [tex]$45 \%$[/tex]
B. [tex]$60 \%$[/tex]
C. About [tex]$82 \%$[/tex]
D. [tex]$40 \%$[/tex]



Answer :

To determine the likelihood that a student who has a sibling does not have a pet, we need to analyze the given relative frequency table:

[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{Siblings} & \text{No siblings} & \text{Total} \\ \hline \text{Pets} & 0.3 & 0.15 & 0.45 \\ \hline \text{No pets} & 0.45 & 0.1 & 0.55 \\ \hline \text{Total} & 0.75 & 0.25 & 1.0 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]

Let's break down the steps:

1. Identify the probability that a student does not have a pet given that they have a sibling.

From the table:
- The probability that a student has siblings and no pets is 0.45.
- The total probability that a student has siblings (regardless of pets) is 0.75.

2. Use the conditional probability formula:
[tex]\[ P(\text{No pets} \mid \text{Siblings}) = \frac{P(\text{Siblings and No pets})}{P(\text{Siblings})} \][/tex]

3. Substitute the values from the table:
[tex]\[ P(\text{No pets} \mid \text{Siblings}) = \frac{0.45}{0.75} \][/tex]

4. Simplify the fraction:
[tex]\[ P(\text{No pets} \mid \text{Siblings}) = \frac{0.45}{0.75} = 0.6 \][/tex]

5. Convert the result to a percentage:
[tex]\[ 0.6 \times 100 = 60\% \][/tex]

So, the likelihood that a student with siblings does not have a pet is [tex]\(\boxed{60\%}\)[/tex].

Therefore, the correct answer is:

B. [tex]\(60 \% \)[/tex]