Let's analyze the given pattern from the start to see if we can deduce the correct answer step-by-step.
### Given expressions:
1. [tex]\(4 + 2 = 26\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\(8 + 1 = 79\)[/tex]
3. [tex]\(6 + 5 = 111\)[/tex]
4. [tex]\(7 + 3 = ?\)[/tex]
Considering these examples, we need to find a consistent pattern in how the results are computed. Let's break down potential steps or rules being applied.
### Step-by-Step Analysis:
1. First expression:
[tex]\[ 4 + 2 \rightarrow 26 \][/tex]
Here, it looks like a multi-digit output. Notice that the sum (4 + 2) is 6.
However, putting '6' directly as the last part can't be correct because:
- There's something relating '4' and '6' to get '26'.
2. Second expression:
[tex]\[ 8 + 1 \rightarrow 79 \][/tex]
The sum (8 + 1) is 9.
Similarly, examining the parts '8' and '9' yields '79'
3. Third expression:
[tex]\[ 6 + 5 \rightarrow 111 \][/tex]
Here, the sum (6 + 5) is 11.
The pattern might relate '6' directly tying with '11' as getting '111'.
From these, it's seen, the result may typically end up creating a sum and multiplying by some factor related to the first digit.
### Inferring the Pattern:
From gathered observations, it’s creating something close or getting last digit summing together before concatenating.
Hence,
For [tex]\(7 + 3\)[/tex]:
1. The sum [tex]\(7 + 3 = 10\)[/tex].
As per the analysis:
Combining [tex]\(7\)[/tex] and [tex]\(10\)[/tex] in a pattern that forms an understandable pattern,
The final result for [tex]\(7 + 3\)[/tex] appears logically: [tex]\[ 80 \][/tex]
This pattern holds given steps and considerable outcomes.
Thus:
[tex]\[ \boxed{80} \][/tex]
So, the answer to [tex]\(7 + 3\)[/tex] is [tex]\(80\)[/tex].
