Voter Turnout and Election-Day Registration

\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{States with Election-Day Registration} \\
\hline 2008 & [tex]$72 \%$[/tex] \\
\hline 2012 & [tex]$65 \%$[/tex] \\
\hline \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{States without Election-Day Registration} \\
\hline 2008 & [tex]$62 \%$[/tex] \\
\hline 2012 & [tex]$58 \%$[/tex] \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

Based on the data, what conclusion can you draw about election-day registration in states where it was an option?

A. It helped to increase voter turnout.
B. It slightly lowered voter turnout.
C. It was an option in more states in 2008.
D. It will be adopted by more states in 2012.



Answer :

To determine the effect of election-day registration on voter turnout, let's analyze the provided data step by step. We need to compare voter turnout percentages in states with and without election-day registration for both the years 2008 and 2012.

1. Data analysis for states with Election-Day Registration:
- Voter turnout in 2008: [tex]\( 72\% \)[/tex]
- Voter turnout in 2012: [tex]\( 65\% \)[/tex]

Calculate the change in voter turnout in these states:
[tex]\[ 72\% - 65\% = 7\% \][/tex]
So, the voter turnout decreased by [tex]\( 7\% \)[/tex] from 2008 to 2012 in states with election-day registration.

2. Data analysis for states without Election-Day Registration:
- Voter turnout in 2008: [tex]\( 62\% \)[/tex]
- Voter turnout in 2012: [tex]\( 58\% \)[/tex]

Calculate the change in voter turnout in these states:
[tex]\[ 62\% - 58\% = 4\% \][/tex]
So, the voter turnout decreased by [tex]\( 4\% \)[/tex] from 2008 to 2012 in states without election-day registration.

3. Comparative analysis:
- In states with election-day registration, the voter turnout decreased by [tex]\( 7\% \)[/tex].
- In states without election-day registration, the voter turnout decreased by [tex]\( 4\% \)[/tex].

Since the decrease in voter turnout was greater in states with election-day registration, we can derive that election-day registration was likely more widespread or had a larger impact in attracting voters in 2008 compared to 2012.

4. Conclusion:
Given this analysis, we draw the conclusion:
[tex]\[ \text{It was an option in more states in 2008.} \][/tex]