Which of the following best explains why clear-cutting forests is more destructive than selectively cutting in forests?

A. Clear-cutting eliminates all trees, leaving none behind to maintain soil fertility or house native animals.
B. Clear-cutting places the land at greater risk for wildfires.
C. Clear-cutting makes land more attractive for human development.
D. Clear-cutting causes less soil erosion than selective cutting.

Please select the best answer from the choices provided.

Clear-cutting forests eliminates all trees, disrupting habitats and soil fertility, compared to selective cutting. Strip cutting can help regenerate the forest and prevent extensive damage.

Explanation:

Clear-cutting forests is more destructive than selectively cutting forests because it eliminates all trees, disrupting habitats and soil fertility, compared to selectively cutting, which maintains habitats and prevents soil erosion by leaving most trees untouched. For example, clear-cutting in tropical forests can lead to significant ecosystem damage due to the removal of crucial trees.

Forest studies have indicated that tropical rain forests are resilient and can recover with proper forest management. Strip cutting, as an alternative to clear-cutting, involves harvesting in narrower strips, leaving rows of trees standing, allowing for the regeneration of the forest.

Learn more about deforestation here:

https://brainly.com/question/40184701