Given the system of equations as presented, the solution to the question is not clearly defined. Therefore, I have followed a methodical approach to determine that the result is indeed `None`.
Firstly, we observe that the points appear to refer to solutions from two separate systems of equations.
If we interpret each pair of points as potential solutions to the said systems, we must establish some consistency criteria or solve for parameters that yield equalities true for both points in each pair.
Pair 1 appears as:
[tex]\[ (-23,400,3,400) \quad \text{and} \quad (-1,170,170) \][/tex]
We can assert that no evident pattern or equation structure distinctly links these pairs without additional constraints or definitions. Consequently, the exact solution is indeterminable based on the information given.
Pair 2 appears as:
[tex]\[ (-1,170,-23,400) \quad \text{and} \quad (170,3,400) \][/tex]
Once again, there's no direct mathematical relationship or transformation that's apparent or provided in the question to link these pairs into a unified solution to a system of equations.
For Pair 3:
[tex]\[ (274,726) \quad \text{and} \quad (5,480,14,520) \][/tex]
without well-defined equations or relational rules, we face the same indeterminate understanding.
Lastly, Pair 4:
[tex]\[ (274,5,480) \quad \text{and} \quad (726,14,520) \][/tex]
consist of sets that do not provide an explicit method or pattern to deduce a general solution to a system.
Given this, the solution remains undetermined with the information given, hence we conclude the true solution as:
```
None
```
While it may be tempting to deduce relationships or contrive methods, this problem requires equation definitions and a structured system to articulate precise solutions.
