Dred Scott sued for freedom after living in free territories, but the Supreme Court rejected his claim due to his lack of citizenship and ruled that slaves were considered property.
Dred Scott, a slave, argued for his freedom based on the time he spent in free territories where slavery was banned, specifically in Illinois and Wisconsin. However, the Supreme Court ruled against him, stating that he could not sue for his freedom as blacks, whether free or slave, were not considered U.S. citizens. This decision emphasized that slaves were seen as property, not individuals with rights.
https://brainly.com/question/42862203