Tamar rode her bike 3 miles in 18 minutes. Leah walked 15,840 feet in 50 minutes. There are 5,280 feet in 1 mile.

Which explanation about the distance that Tamar rode and Leah walked is true?

A. Leah walked farther than Tamar rode because 15,840 is greater than 3.

B. Tamar rode farther than Leah walked because miles are longer than feet.

C. Tamar rode the same distance Leah walked because 15,840 feet is equal to 3 miles.

D. Leah walked farther than Tamar rode because Leah walked for 50 minutes and Tamar rode for 18 minutes.



Answer :

To determine which explanation about the distance that Tamar rode and Leah walked is true, we need to compare the distances in the same unit. Here are the step-by-step details:

1. Determine Leah’s distance in miles:
- Leah walked 15,840 feet.
- There are 5,280 feet in a mile.
- Convert feet to miles: [tex]\( \frac{15840 \text{ feet}}{5280 \text{ feet/mile}} = 3 \text{ miles} \)[/tex].

2. Determine Tamar’s distance in miles:
- Tamar rode 3 miles on her bike.

3. Comparison:
- Leah walked 3 miles.
- Tamar rode 3 miles.
- Since 3 miles is equal to 3 miles, Leah walked the same distance that Tamar rode.

4. Evaluate the choices:
- Choice A: Incorrect. Leah and Tamar both traveled the same distance. Saying that Leah walked farther because 15,840 is greater than 3 does not account for the conversion between feet and miles.
- Choice B: Incorrect. The statement is misleading. Although miles are longer than feet, when 15,840 feet is converted to miles, it equals 3 miles – the same distance Tamar rode.
- Choice C: Correct. Leah walked the same distance Tamar rode because 15,840 feet is indeed equal to 3 miles.
- Choice D: Incorrect. The time taken (50 minutes by Leah and 18 minutes by Tamar) does not affect the comparison of distances traveled.

Therefore, the correct explanation is:
C. Tamar rode the same distance Leah walked because 15,840 feet is equal to 3 miles.