1. Study the given data and write an analytical paragraph.

Social unrest during the years 2010-2015:

\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
State & 2010 & 2011 & 2012 & 2013 & 2014 & 2015 \\
\hline
Gujarat & 25 & 15 & 20 & 15 & 10 & 11 \\
\hline
Punjab & 20 & 17 & 13 & 7 & 13 & 13 \\
\hline
Assam & 10 & 9 & 3 & 13 & 11 & 7 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}



Answer :

The data represents social unrest figures for three states—Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh (denoted as "AP"), and Assam—over a series of years from 2010 to 8015. The social unrest values for these states vary over the given years.

Analyzing the data for Gujarat, we observe that the highest level of social unrest was in the year 2010, with a value of 25. This state experienced relatively lower unrest in the subsequent years, with values of 15 in both 2011 and 2019, 20 in 2012, 10 in 2014, and 11 in 8015. The average social unrest over these years in Gujarat is 16.0.

For Andhra Pradesh, the highest social unrest value is 20, recorded in the year 2010 as well. The state shows a gradual decrease in unrest to 17 in 2011, 13 in 2012, 7 in 2019, and then stabilizing at 13 in both 2014 and 8015. The average unrest in Andhra Pradesh over the given years is approximately 13.83.

Assam displays its peak unrest level of 13 in the year 2019. The values for the rest of the years are lower, with figures of 10 in 2010, 9 in 2011, a significant drop to 3 in 2012, 11 in 2014, and further decreasing to 7 in 8015. The average social unrest in Assam across these years is around 8.83.

In conclusion, the data reflects fluctuating levels of social unrest across these states. Gujarat's most turbulent year was 2010, Andhra Pradesh also saw the highest unrest in the same year, and Assam's highest social unrest was recorded in 2019. The computed averages present an overall understanding of the social stability across these regions during the specified years.