Direct evidence directly proves a fact, like eyewitness testimony or a defendant's confession, while circumstantial evidence indirectly proves a fact such as fingerprint evidence at a crime scene.
Direct evidence directly proves a fact, such as eyewitness testimony or a defendant's confession. It is more straightforward and requires less inference compared to circumstantial evidence, which indirectly proves a fact like fingerprint evidence at a crime scene.
Examples of direct evidence include an eyewitness testifying to seeing the defendant commit a crime or a video recording of the crime taking place.
https://brainly.com/question/34141599