Final answer:
Winona LaDuke effectively argued for reducing light pollution by emphasizing its broader environmental impacts beyond astronomy.
Explanation:
Winona LaDuke effectively argued for reducing light pollution by highlighting its impact on the environment beyond just astronomers' concerns. Non-astronomical reasons to oppose light pollution include its effects on wildlife, energy wastage, and disruptions to natural ecosystems. Studies show that artificial light can harm both human health and nocturnal animals, indicating the importance of addressing this issue.
Learn more about Impact of light pollution on the environment here:
https://brainly.com/question/30046079
