Directions: Please read "Five Accounts of the Assassination of Malcolm X" located in Chapter 4 on page 4-1c. Use your textbook to answer the questions below in your own words.

One of the most important reading and thinking skills is the ability to draw valid inferences. Inferences are conclusions that the author implies rather than states. By considering the writer's point of view and purpose, you can draw valid inferences and conclusions about the account. Answer the following question about the accounts to help you draw conclusions:

In Life, Malcolm X is described as being the "shrillest voice of black supremacy" and giving speeches "flaying the hated white man." Is it good or bad to have a "shrill" voice? Do you think the writer respects the point of view that Malcolm X expressed? What do you base your conclusion on?



Answer :

Final answer:

The 'shrill' voice of Malcolm X is contextual, the writer likely respects his viewpoint, and the author's nuanced portrayal shows respect for Malcolm X's significance.


Explanation:

It is neither inherently good nor bad to have a 'shrill' voice; the judgment often depends on the context and the message being conveyed. In the case of Malcolm X, being described as the 'shrillest voice of black supremacy' indicates the intensity and fervor with which he delivered his message of empowerment and resistance against oppression.

The writer's respect for Malcolm X's point of view can be inferred from the detailed depiction of his journey, beliefs, and actions. Despite differing views on integration and methods, the writer acknowledges Malcolm X's significant role as a voice for Black empowerment and independence.

Based on the writer's nuanced portrayal of Malcolm X's evolution, influence, and impact on the civil rights movement, it can be concluded that the writer respects the complexity and significance of the point of view expressed by Malcolm X.


Learn more about Malcolm X's viewpoint and the writer's depiction here:

https://brainly.com/question/30442538