An explanation of logical fallacies, specifically focusing on Appeal to Ignorance and Hasty Generalization, along with addressing the misconception surrounding monkeys' ability to talk.
Appeal to Ignorance: This fallacy occurs when an argument is made based on the lack of evidence for a claim, assuming it to be true because it hasn't been proven false. This error stems from placing the burden of proof incorrectly.
Hasty Generalization: This fallacy involves drawing a conclusion without sufficient data to support it, leading to unjustified generalizations or conclusions. Lack of evidence or biased samples can contribute to this fallacy.
Monkeys Talking: Just because monkeys haven't been heard talking doesn't necessarily mean they can't. Absence of evidence does not equate to evidence of absence, and it's crucial to not use lack of proof as proof of non-existence.
https://brainly.com/question/29368484