Children like ice cream, which is full of calcium and other vitamins, so they should be allowed to eat it at all meals.

What type of fallacy is shown here?

A. Non-sequitur: Even though ice cream is enjoyable, the sugar mitigates a few key nutrients.
B. False analogy: One thing has nothing to do with the other. They aren't related at all.
C. Circular: The first premise doesn't follow the other ideas.

The statement showcases the Non-sequitur fallacy by linking ice cream's nutritional benefits to children eating it at every meal, disregarding the negative impact of the sugar content.

Explanation:

The type of fallacy shown in the statement is Non-sequitur. While ice cream may contain calcium and some vitamins, the presence of sugar counteracts the nutritional benefits it provides, making it inefficient to be consumed at every meal.

Additional Information:

Ice cream sales and burglaries being correlated does not mean one causes the other, illustrating the correlation-causation fallacy.
A faulty argument suggests that because ice cream contains unnatural substances, like some prescription drugs, it should be avoided, linking two unrelated subjects illogically.
Another example of a non-sequitur fallacy would be affirming the consequent, where the conclusion does not logically follow the premise.

Learn more about Logical Fallacies and Fallacious Arguments here:

https://brainly.com/question/37050581