If George Washington's popularity was due to how much he did for his country, President Clinton's popularity must be due to the same sort of accomplishments.

What type of fallacy is shown here?

A. Circular Reasoning: an argument where instead of supplying evidence, the point is simply restated.
B. Non Sequitur: a conclusion that does not follow logically from preceding statements.
C. False Analogy: assuming that since two things are alike in some respects, they are alike in others.



Answer :

Final answer:

The fallacy shown in the question is false analogy, where the comparison between George Washington and President Clinton's popularity based on their contributions is not valid.


Explanation:

False Analogy: The fallacy exhibited here is false analogy. It occurs when two things are compared in some aspects, but the comparison fails in the wider context. In this case, equating George Washington and President Clinton's popularity based on their contributions falls under this type of fallacy.


Learn more about Logical Fallacy here:

https://brainly.com/question/29368484