\begin{tabular}{lr}
& Hours \\
Move time ................... & 3.9 \\
Wait time ........... & 23.8 \\
Queue time .......... & 1.1 \\
Process time ...... & 0.4 \\
Inspection time ..... & \\
\end{tabular}

Emerich Corporation keeps careful track of the time required to fill orders. The times recorded for a particular order are shown. The manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) was closest to:

A) 0.18

B) 0.03

C) 0.49

D) 0.09



Answer :

To determine the Manufacturing Cycle Efficiency (MCE), we will follow a systematic approach involving several steps:

1. Identify and sum up all the given times:
We are given the following times:
- Move time: 3.9 hours
- Wait time: 23.8 hours
- Queue time: 1.1 hours
- Process time: 0.4 hours
- Inspection time: (not provided, assumed to be 0.0 hours)

2. Calculate the total cycle time:
We sum up all the times to get the total time required to fill the order:
[tex]\[ \text{Total time} = \text{Move time} + \text{Wait time} + \text{Queue time} + \text{Process time} + \text{Inspection time} \][/tex]
Plugging in the values:
[tex]\[ \text{Total time} = 3.9 + 23.8 + 1.1 + 0.4 + 0.0 = 29.2 \text{ hours} \][/tex]

3. Determine the value-added time:
The value-added time in a manufacturing process is typically the process time. In this case, the process time is 0.4 hours.

4. Calculate the Manufacturing Cycle Efficiency (MCE):
The MCE is a measure of the efficiency of the manufacturing process and is calculated by dividing the value-added time by the total cycle time:
[tex]\[ \text{MCE} = \frac{\text{Value-added time}}{\text{Total time}} \][/tex]
Substituting in the given values:
[tex]\[ \text{MCE} = \frac{0.4}{29.2} \][/tex]
Calculating the quotient:
[tex]\[ \text{MCE} \approx 0.0136986 \][/tex]

5. Round the MCE to match the provided answer choices:
The possible answers given are in a rounded format. We can round the MCE to two decimal places for closer comparison:
[tex]\[ \text{MCE rounded} \approx 0.01 \][/tex]

After following these steps and rounding to two decimal places, the closest value to the MCE from the given options is:

B) 0.03. However, the correct calculation shows it should be approximately 0.01.

Since the closest value among the options given still remains 0.03 after the rounding errors might be an issue, the closest closest between exact and given electoral still remains 0.03 although calculated efficiencies in handwritten would be accurately exacted better to account for mismatched rounding errors.