Final answer:
Judicial activism defends rights, while judicial restraint limits judicial power.
Explanation:
Judicial activism is when judges actively use their power to defend individual rights and liberties by striking down actions or laws they see as infringing on these rights.
Judicial restraint is when judges limit their own power, preferring to defer decisions to elected branches of government and focusing on a narrower interpretation of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Learn more about Judicial activism and judicial restraint here:
https://brainly.com/question/29545866
