(03.05 HC)

Belinda wants to invest [tex]$\$[/tex] 1,000$. The table below shows the value of her investment under two different options for three different years:

\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Number of years & 1 & 2 & 3 \\
\hline
Option 1 (amount in dollars) & 1300 & 1690 & 2197 \\
\hline
Option 2 (amount in dollars) & 1300 & 1600 & 1900 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

Part A: What type of function, linear or exponential, can be used to describe the value of the investment after a fixed number of years using Option 1 and Option 2? Explain your answer. (2 points)

Part B: Write one function for each option to describe the value of the investment [tex]\(f(n)\)[/tex], in dollars, after [tex]\(n\)[/tex] years. (4 points)

Part C: Belinda wants to invest in an option that would help to increase her investment value by the greatest amount in 20 years. Will there be any significant difference in the value of Belinda's investment after 20 years if she uses Option 2 over Option 1? Explain your answer, and show the investment value after 20 years for each option. (4 points)



Answer :

### Part A: Determine the Type of Function

To determine whether the investment values follow a linear or exponential function, we analyze how the values change over the years:

Option 1:
- From Year 1 to Year 2: [tex]\( \$1300 \to \$1690 \)[/tex]
- Approximate growth factor: [tex]\( \frac{1690}{1300} \approx 1.3 \)[/tex]
- From Year 2 to Year 3: [tex]\( \$1690 \to \$2197 \)[/tex]
- Approximate growth factor: [tex]\( \frac{2197}{1690} \approx 1.3 \)[/tex]

Since the investment values increase by approximately multiplying by a constant factor (1.3), Option 1 can be described using an exponential function.

Option 2:
- From Year 1 to Year 2: [tex]\( \$1300 \to \$1600 \)[/tex]
- Difference: [tex]\(1600 - 1300 = 300\)[/tex]
- From Year 2 to Year 3: [tex]\( \$1600 \to \$1900 \)[/tex]
- Difference: [tex]\(1900 - 1600 = 300\)[/tex]

Since the investment values increase by a constant difference of \[tex]$300, Option 2 can be described using a linear function. ### Part B: Write the Functions Based on the observations from Part A, we can define the functions for each option: Option 1 (Exponential): The formula for an exponential function is \( f(n) = \text{initial amount} \times (\text{growth rate})^n \). - Initial amount: \$[/tex]1000
- Growth rate: 1.3

[tex]\[ f_1(n) = 1000 \times (1.3)^n \][/tex]

Option 2 (Linear):
The formula for a linear function is [tex]\( f(n) = \text{initial amount} + (\text{annual increase} \times n) \)[/tex].

- Initial amount: \[tex]$1000 - Annual increase: \$[/tex]300

[tex]\[ f_2(n) = 1000 + (300 \times n) \][/tex]

### Part C: Calculate the Investment Value After 20 Years

To find the investment values after 20 years for both options, we substitute [tex]\( n = 20 \)[/tex] into the respective functions:

Option 1 (Exponential):

[tex]\[ f_1(20) = 1000 \times (1.3)^{20} \][/tex]

The investment value after 20 years is approximately:

[tex]\[ 190,049.64 \][/tex]

Option 2 (Linear):

[tex]\[ f_2(20) = 1000 + (300 \times 20) \][/tex]

The investment value after 20 years is:

[tex]\[ 1000 + 6000 = 7000 \][/tex]

### Determine the Difference:

To find if there is a significant difference, we calculate the difference between the two investment values:

[tex]\[ \text{Difference} = 190,049.64 - 7000 = 183,049.64 \][/tex]

### Conclusion:

Belinda's investment value after 20 years using Option 1 (exponential growth) will be \[tex]$190,049.64, and using Option 2 (linear growth) will be \$[/tex]7000. There is a significant difference of \$183,049.64 between the two options. Therefore, Belinda should choose Option 1 to maximize her investment's growth over 20 years.