Henry argues against reconciliation with Britain due to the risk of further revolts and emphasizes the necessity of independence to maintain peace and prevent civil wars. Many individuals are shown to prefer independence over a patched-up reconciliation due to the sufferings experienced.
Henry's claim that civil interaction between the colonies and Great Britain is no longer an option is advanced by his statement that reconciliation with Britain is a dangerous doctrine, as it may lead to further revolts and fatal consequences (Text 2). Additionally, he emphasizes the importance of independence to maintain peace on the continent and prevent civil wars (Text 3). Lastly, he argues that a patched-up connection through reconciliation poses more danger than independence, highlighting the sentiment of many to not relish the idea of reconciliation based on the sufferings endured (Text 7).
https://brainly.com/question/41429425