To solve the question correctly, let's analyze each of the provided options carefully.
The binary negation ([tex]$\neg$[/tex]) operation on the sequence 0202 isn't standard binary negation, and this appears to be more of a digit-based problem with potential formatting quirks. Given multiple-choice options, we can evaluate them one by one and see how they fit with 0202 to make the proper match:
Option A. 7 tens + 202 tenths:
1. '7 tens' translates to 70.
2. '202 tenths' means 202 0.1 = 20.2.
So, this option evaluates to 70 + 20.2 = 90.2, which doesn't match the structure of the digits 0202.
Option B. 7 tens + 2 tenths + 2 thousandths:
1. '7 tens' translates to 70.
2. '2 tenths' means 2 0.1 = 0.2.
3. '2 thousandths' means 2 0.001 = 0.002.
So, this option evaluates to 70 + 0.2 + 0.002 = 70.202. This fits in a way that the parts are derivative compositions close to the original numbers mentioned (0202).
Option C. 70 ones + 20 hundredths + 2 thousandths:
1. '70 ones' translates to 70.
2. '20 hundredths' means 20 0.01 = 0.2.
3. '2 thousandths' means 2 0.001 = 0.002.
So, this option evaluates to 70 + 0.2 + 0.002 = 70.202. This seems quite similar to Option B, but the structure alignment still seems authenti-cally closer to 0202 knowing different placement setups.
Option D. 70 hundreds + 202 hundredths:
1. '70 hundreds' translates to 70 100 = 7000.
2. '202 hundredths' means 202 * 0.01 = 2.02.
So, this option evaluates to 7000 + 2.02 = 7002.02, which is far off from the number or placement visualhap 0202.
After analyzing each option considering the placement and spectral structuring of given digits 0202:
The correct answer is:
B. 7 tens + 2 tenths + 2 thousandths
