Answered

Why might ping-ponging procedures be preferred over calling a conference committee to reconcile Senate and House differences?

A. Party leaders have more control over conference committees because they appoint them, but ping-ponging allows minority party members more input into the final bill.

B. Ping-ponging is more deliberative and gives many more individuals a say in the bill's contents so legislation can improve through this process compared to conference committees.

C. The president controls the conference committee, while members of Congress can have more control over ping-ponging.

D. An opponent has more opportunities to block a bill during a conference committee by adding unfavorable amendments or by using the filibuster, but party leaders can shield much of this through ping-ponging.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Ping-ponging procedures offer advantages over conference committees due to increased input from minority party members, potential for legislative improvements, and member control over the process.


Explanation:

Ping-ponging procedures may be preferred over calling a conference committee to reconcile Senate and House differences for several reasons:

  • Party leaders have more control over conference committees, while ping-ponging allows minority party members more input into the final bill.
  • Ping-ponging involves more individuals in the legislative process, leading to potential improvements in legislation compared to conference committees.
  • In a conference committee, the president exercises control, whereas members of Congress can have more control over ping-ponging.

Learn more about Legislative Procedures here:

https://brainly.com/question/42569427


Other Questions