The author argues for a ban on smoking in public restaurants to protect public health and reduce the risks of secondhand smoke exposure by presenting supporting evidence and a suggested course of action.
The author's main claim in the essay is that smoking should be banned in public restaurants to protect the health of non-smokers and create a healthier environment for all.
The author does acknowledge counterarguments such as personal freedom to smoke, but focuses on the negative health impacts of secondhand smoke and the greater good of public health.
One example where the author provides background information is by citing research studies on the harmful effects of secondhand smoke. While this is a good start, more statistical data and real-life examples could enhance the argument's credibility.
Yes, the author suggests implementing a ban on smoking in public restaurants as the course of action to address the health concerns associated with secondhand smoke.
https://brainly.com/question/18691156