Answer :
To analyze the data provided in the chart and address the given statements, let's proceed step-by-step with the calculations and interpretations:
1. Active Military Participation:
- In 1916, the number of citizens in active military service was 0.18 million.
- In 1919, this number increased to 1.27 million.
To find the change in active military participation:
[tex]\[ \text{Change in active military} = \text{Active military in 1919} - \text{Active military in 1916} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \text{Change in active military} = 1.27 - 0.18 = 1.09 \text{ million} \][/tex]
Hence, the number of people in the armed forces increased by 1.09 million, which is more than one million.
2. Total Employed Workers:
- In 1916, the total number of employed workers was 40.1 million.
- By 1919, this number increased to 42.3 million.
To find the change in the number of employed workers:
[tex]\[ \text{Change in employed workers} = \text{Employed workers in 1919} - \text{Employed workers in 1916} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \text{Change in employed workers} = 42.3 - 40.1 = 2.2 \text{ million} \][/tex]
So, the number of people in the workforce increased by 2.2 million.
3. Analysis of Given Statements:
- The number of people in the armed forces increased by more than one million.
- True, as we calculated an increase of 1.09 million in the armed forces.
- The number of people in the workforce increased by about three million.
- False, as the increase in the workforce was only 2.2 million, which is less than three million.
- The number of people in the armed forces declined by one million.
- False, as the number of people in the armed forces actually increased.
- The number of people in the workforce declined by one million.
- False, there was an increase in the workforce, not a decline.
Based on the data and the calculations:
- The chart indicates that the number of people in the armed forces increased by 1.09 million, more than one million.
- The number of people in the workforce increased by 2.2 million, not about three million.
- There was no decline in either the number of people in the armed forces or in the workforce.
1. Active Military Participation:
- In 1916, the number of citizens in active military service was 0.18 million.
- In 1919, this number increased to 1.27 million.
To find the change in active military participation:
[tex]\[ \text{Change in active military} = \text{Active military in 1919} - \text{Active military in 1916} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \text{Change in active military} = 1.27 - 0.18 = 1.09 \text{ million} \][/tex]
Hence, the number of people in the armed forces increased by 1.09 million, which is more than one million.
2. Total Employed Workers:
- In 1916, the total number of employed workers was 40.1 million.
- By 1919, this number increased to 42.3 million.
To find the change in the number of employed workers:
[tex]\[ \text{Change in employed workers} = \text{Employed workers in 1919} - \text{Employed workers in 1916} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \text{Change in employed workers} = 42.3 - 40.1 = 2.2 \text{ million} \][/tex]
So, the number of people in the workforce increased by 2.2 million.
3. Analysis of Given Statements:
- The number of people in the armed forces increased by more than one million.
- True, as we calculated an increase of 1.09 million in the armed forces.
- The number of people in the workforce increased by about three million.
- False, as the increase in the workforce was only 2.2 million, which is less than three million.
- The number of people in the armed forces declined by one million.
- False, as the number of people in the armed forces actually increased.
- The number of people in the workforce declined by one million.
- False, there was an increase in the workforce, not a decline.
Based on the data and the calculations:
- The chart indicates that the number of people in the armed forces increased by 1.09 million, more than one million.
- The number of people in the workforce increased by 2.2 million, not about three million.
- There was no decline in either the number of people in the armed forces or in the workforce.