Answer :
Final answer:
The fallacies in the passage from Justice Taney's opinion in Dred Scott v. Sandford include circular reasoning and a logical fallacy in equating enslaved status with lack of citizenship.
Explanation:
Issues with Justice Taney's Passage in Dred Scott v. Sandford:
- Justice Taney assumes that the writers of the Constitution would agree with him about citizenship: Taney's interpretation that Black people are not citizens was a personal assertion, not a universal truth accepted by the Constitution's drafters.
- Justice Taney uses the argument that Black people are not citizens to prove that they are not citizens: Circular reasoning is employed by Taney, where the premise and conclusion are essentially the same.
- Justice Taney uses the argument that Dred Scott is an enslaved person to prove that he is not a citizen: Taney conflates Scott's enslaved status with his lack of citizenship, which is a logical fallacy.
Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford here:
https://brainly.com/question/29628567