Answered

Select the correct answer.

Read the excerpt from paragraph 2:

(2) Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?

Which statement correctly assesses whether Henry uses valid reasoning to support his claim?

A. Henry's reasoning is valid because he uses pathos to ask compelling questions.
B. Henry's reasoning is not valid because he uses a hasty generalization to support his claim.
C. Henry's reasoning is not valid because he uses a bandwagon appeal to support his claim.
D. Henry's reasoning is valid because he describes a common-sense universal truth.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Valid reasoning is demonstrated as Patrick Henry logically questions the behavior of individuals in a societal struggle for freedom, using rhetorical devices to engage the audience.


Explanation:

Valid reasoning is when the argument follows logically from the premises provided. In this excerpt, Patrick Henry uses valid reasoning as he questions the actions of wise men in a struggle for liberty, highlighting the importance of facing painful truths over indulging in false hope.

Henry's reasoning in this excerpt can be described as valid because he logically connects the behavior of individuals to the broader context of a societal struggle for freedom, emphasizing the significance of recognizing harsh realities.

By employing rhetorical questions and vivid imagery, Henry engages the audience emotionally and intellectually, appealing to their sense of reason and morality to support his argument.


Learn more about Valid reasoning in persuasive writing here:

https://brainly.com/question/40643028