Answered

Overview

In the case of Lucy v. Zehmer, Zehmer spent the night drinking with his friend Lucy. During the evening, Zehmer agreed to sell his farm to Lucy. In this assignment, you will review the full case study, analyze the elements and ruling, and indicate whether you agree with the ruling.

Prompt

Read the Lucy v. Zehmer case summary in the "Elements of the Offer" section of Chapter 14 in relation to contract law.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

- Identify the contractual element Zehmer contended was missing.
- Summarize the court ruling and explain the reason for the ruling.
- Agree or disagree with the ruling, and include a rationale to support your ideas.
- Summarize a personal experience in which you entered into a contract that you did not think was binding. Consider which elements of a contract were in place and which were missing.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The case involved Zehmer's contention on the element of serious intention, the court ruling in favor of Lucy, and a personal agreement with the ruling.


Explanation:

Zehmer contended that the element of serious intention was missing in the contract.

The court ruled in favor of Lucy, stating that Zehmer's actions and words during the negotiation process showed a serious intent to enter into the contract.

I agree with the ruling because based on the evidence presented, Zehmer's behavior indicated a genuine intention to sell his farm.


Learn more about Legal case analysis here:

https://brainly.com/question/34373381


Other Questions