An invalid argument lacks support from the reasons for the conclusion, characterizing it as invalid. Inductive arguments focus on probability rather than certainty, using the terms strong or weak for evaluation.
An argument in which the reasons do not support the conclusion so that the conclusion does not follow from the reasons being offered is called invalid. In inductive reasoning, the conclusion is not guaranteed by the premises but is supported with a high level of probability. Unlike deductive arguments, which aim for certainty, inductive arguments focus on probability and are evaluated as strong or weak.
https://brainly.com/question/40303052