Answer :
Final answer:
The author refutes the idea that the American colonists should appeal to Parliament by highlighting the necessity of separation due to British unresponsiveness.
Explanation:
The argument the author anticipates and refutes in this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence is option A: If the American colonists are unhappy with the king, they should appeal to Parliament. The author acknowledges the attempts made to address grievances with the British brethren and the king directly, showing that appealing to Parliament is not the solution they seek.
Furthermore, the text mentions how despite appeals to justice, magnanimity, and common kindred ties, the British were unresponsive, leading to the necessity of separation. This highlights the author's stance against the notion that appealing to Parliament would resolve the issues raised.
In summary, the author refutes the argument that the American colonists should solely address their unhappiness with the king by appealing to Parliament, emphasizing the need for independence due to the lack of response and understanding from the British authorities.
Learn more about American Revolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/41429425