Jamal and Pam asked two groups of students whether they like football. Jamal surveyed 25 of his friends, and Pam surveyed 100 people randomly. The tables below show the results. Based on the data, which statement makes the least sense?

Jamal's Sample
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline Answer & Percent \\
\hline Yes & [tex]$88 \%$[/tex] \\
\hline No & [tex]$12 \%$[/tex] \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

Pam's Sample
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline Answer & Percent \\
\hline Yes & [tex]$58 \%$[/tex] \\
\hline No & [tex]$42 \%$[/tex] \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

A. Pam's survey is more likely to be representative of the population than Jamal's because she surveyed more people and did so randomly.

B. If Jamal likes football and he surveyed his friends, it is likely that his sample is biased.

C. Probably about [tex]$58 \%$[/tex] of the students in the school like football because Pam's survey was random and most likely was representative of the population.

D. Probably about [tex]$88 \%$[/tex] of the students in the school like football because Jamal surveyed only his friends.



Answer :

To determine which statement makes the least sense based on the given data, let's analyze each statement carefully.

1. Statement 1: "Parn's survey is more likely to be representative of the population than Jamal's because she surveyed more people and did so randomly."
- Pam surveyed 100 people randomly, which increases the likelihood that her sample is representative of the entire school population.
- Jamal surveyed only 25 of his friends, which is a much smaller and biased sample.
- This statement makes sense because larger, random samples tend to be more representative of the population.

2. Statement 2: "If Jamal likes football and he surveyed his friends, it is likely that his sample is biased."
- If Jamal enjoys football, he might have friends who share the same interest, leading to a biased sample.
- This statement makes sense because personal biases can influence the results when the sample consists only of friends.

3. Statement 3: "Probably about 58% of the students in the school like football because Pam's survey was random and most likely was representative of the population."
- Pam's survey was random and included a larger sample size (100 people), making it more representative of the school's population.
- Based on this, it is reasonable to estimate that about 58% of the students like football.
- This statement makes sense because Pam's methodology supports the reliability of this estimate.

4. Statement 4: "Probably about 88% of the students in the school like football because Jamal surveyed only his friends."
- Jamal's survey result shows that 88% of his friends like football.
- However, since Jamal's sample consists only of his friends and is not random, it is highly likely to be biased.
- Extrapolating this percentage to the entire school population is not reasonable.
- This statement makes the least sense because it incorrectly assumes that the result from a biased and small sample is representative of the entire school's population.

Based on the analysis above, the statement that makes the least sense is:
```
Statement 4: "Probably about 88% of the students in the school like football because Jamal surveyed only his friends."
```

This conclusion aligns with the numerical result provided: 3 (index of the least sensible statement, considering statements are typically zero-indexed).