[CM.01] The table below shows the average annual precipitation over a period of five years in three agricultural locations of Florida.

\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline Locations & Amount of precipitation \\
\hline 1 & Between 45 to 65 inches \\
\hline 2 & More than 96 inches \\
\hline 3 & Less than 8 inches \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

Which of these statements is most likely true for Location 3?

A. It is the most populated location.
B. It is very far away from the ocean.
C. Its people would depend on rivers for water.
D. Its people would leave and migrate to other locations.



Answer :

To determine which statement is most likely true for Location 3, we need to consider the average annual precipitation and its implications on the living conditions in that location.

Based on the data provided in the table:
- Location 1 receives between 45 to 65 inches of precipitation annually.
- Location 2 receives more than 96 inches of precipitation annually.
- Location 3 receives less than 8 inches of precipitation annually.

With Location 3 receiving less than 8 inches of annual precipitation, the following considerations are key:

1. Very low precipitation generally indicates a scarcity of water resources.
2. Limited water availability could make agriculture and daily living challenging, affecting the population density.
3. Since water is a crucial resource, the inhabitants of Location 3 would need to find alternative water sources or solutions.

Given these factors, we can analyze the provided statements:

1. "It is the most populated location."
- Less water availability generally discourages large populations. Therefore, this statement is unlikely to be true.

2. "It is very far away from the ocean."
- The distance from the ocean is not directly indicated by the precipitation data since various factors can influence precipitation levels.

3. "Its people would depend on rivers for water."
- Due to the limited annual precipitation, it is logical that the people in Location 3 would rely on alternative water sources like rivers for their water needs.

4. "Its people would leave and migrate to other locations."
- If living conditions are harsh due to the lack of water, migration to areas with better water availability is also a plausible option.

Comparing statements 3 and 4:
- Depending on rivers for water is a direct response to the immediate need for water supply.
- Migration is an alternative solution if living conditions become unsustainable.

Therefore, the most likely true statement for Location 3 is:
- "Its people would depend on rivers for water."

An additional possible true statement is:
- "Its people would leave and migrate to other locations."

Thus, the final analysis confirms that:
- The most likely situation is that the people would depend on rivers for water (statement 3).
- An alternative situation is that the people might leave and migrate to other locations (statement 4).

Hence, the correct answer is:
- Option 3: "Its people would depend on rivers for water."
- The alternative plausible answer is:
- Option 4: "Its people would leave and migrate to other locations."