Under the Frye standard, why would a blood alcohol test be admissible in court, but a polygraph test not be?

A. The blood alcohol test is not reproducible under similar circumstances nor is it widely accepted by the scientific community as reliable, while a polygraph is.
B. The blood alcohol test is reproducible under similar circumstances and it is widely accepted by the scientific community as reliable, while a polygraph is not.
C. The above statement is incorrect; both tests are reproducible and accepted by the scientific community and would be admitted under the Frye standard.
D. The above statement is incorrect; neither test is reproducible nor accepted by the scientific community and would not be admitted under the Frye standard.

The reason why a drug alcohol test would be admissible in court under the Frye standard, but a polygraph test would not be, is because of the scientific acceptance and reproducibility of the tests. Alcohol tests, such as blood alcohol tests, are generally accepted by the scientific community and are reproducible under similar circumstances, making them reliable for court use. On the other hand, polygraph tests, which measure psychological stress through physical responses like sweating and heartbeat, are not widely accepted by the scientific community due to their unreliability and lack of reproducibility.

Learn more about Admissibility of alcohol and polygraph tests in court here:

https://brainly.com/question/39391915