Polygraph tests are not admissible evidence under the Daubert ruling, while DNA evidence and Fingerprinting evidence are usually considered reliable forms of evidence.
Polygraph tests would fail as admissible evidence under the Daubert ruling. While DNA evidence and Fingerprinting evidence are usually considered reliable and compelling forms of circumstantial evidence, polygraph tests are generally not admissible in court due to their unreliability and lack of scientific validity.
https://brainly.com/question/39391915