Which statement best describes a similarity between the two historians' arguments?

A. Both try to persuade the reader by only including details that support their arguments.
B. Neither can be considered a credible source because they did not experience the American Revolution.
C. Both try to confuse the reader with unrelated details rather than making any strong claims.
D. Neither uses any historical evidence to support his claims about the American Revolution.

Both historians view the American Revolution as significant for freedom and liberty, with one seeing it as maintaining the status quo and the other as a radical quest for democracy and equality.

Explanation:

Both historians' arguments have similarities in that they view the American Revolution as a pivotal moment for freedom and liberty. One perspective sees it as a struggle for independence, maintaining the status quo, while the other views it as a radical social upheaval aiming for greater democracy and equality. Historians in different eras also interpret the Revolution's impact differently.

Learn more about Interpretations of the American Revolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/28228324