Evaluating the reliability of historical sources involves assessing factors like origin, bias, accuracy, and objectivity to determine credibility.
When evaluating Franklin D. Roosevelt's speech excerpt from 1933 and Dr. Emily Collins' analysis, it's crucial to consider the origin of the information. The speech can be considered a primary source as it comes directly from Roosevelt himself, giving insight into his viewpoint during the Great Depression. On the other hand, Dr. Collins' analysis should be assessed for accuracy and objectivity, looking at whether she uses credible sources and presents a balanced perspective.
Additionally, examining bias in both sources is essential. Roosevelt's speech may contain rhetoric aimed at boosting morale, while Dr. Collins may have her own interpretation that could introduce bias. Checking for citations in Dr. Collins' analysis can help determine the validity of her claims and whether she cherry-picked facts. Finally, considering if the sources have been peer-reviewed or received editorial scrutiny can add to their credibility.
https://brainly.com/question/42286563