Answered

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney.

"The question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States. On the contrary, they were at that time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the Government might choose to grant them."

Which statement best serves as a counterclaim to the claim in this passage?

A. Taney fails to provide any actual evidence for his statements that Black people were universally considered inferior.
B. Taney cannot use states' rights to claim that the plaintiff is not a citizen, because citizenship is federal.
C. Taney's argument that emancipated people were still controlled by White people is false because they were free.
D. Taney's argument that Blacks were not citizens is false because their ancestors were forced to come here.



Answer :

Final answer:

The Dred Scott v. Sandford case denied Black individuals citizenship rights in the U.S., showcasing the challenges they faced in obtaining legal equality.


Explanation:

The Dred Scott v. Sandford case involved Chief Justice Taney declaring that Black individuals could not be citizens of the United States, leading to a ruling that denied Dred Scott's right to sue for freedom. Taney argued that the Constitution did not intend to include slaves under its protection.

One counterclaim to Taney's assertion could be that his argument lacks evidence for the universal inferiority of Black people or that the claim of emancipated individuals being still controlled by White people is false.

This landmark case highlighted the struggles faced by Black individuals, both enslaved and free, in obtaining equal citizenship rights and how the Constitution was interpreted to deny them such rights.


Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford case here:

https://brainly.com/question/40924031