Classify the system of equations.

[tex]\[
\begin{array}{c}
\frac{1}{2} x + y = 1 \\
-\frac{1}{2} x - 2y = -2
\end{array}
\][/tex]

Click on the correct answer.

A. intersecting
B. parallel
C. coincident



Answer :

To classify the system of equations:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{c} \frac{1}{2} x + y = 1 \\ -\frac{2}{2} x - 2y = -2 \end{array} \][/tex]

we need to determine if the lines represented by these equations are intersecting, parallel, or coincident.

First, let's rewrite the equations in standard linear form [tex]\(Ax + By = C\)[/tex].

For the first equation:
[tex]\[\frac{1}{2} x + y = 1\][/tex]

Multiply through by 2 to clear the fraction:
[tex]\[x + 2y = 2\][/tex]

For the second equation:
[tex]\[-\frac{2}{2} x - 2y = -2\][/tex]

Simplify the term [tex]\(-\frac{2}{2} x\)[/tex] to [tex]\(-x\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[-x - 2y = -2\][/tex]

Now we have:
[tex]\[ \begin{aligned} 1.\quad &x + 2y = 2 \\ 2.\quad &-x - 2y = -2 \end{aligned} \][/tex]

To analyze if the lines are intersecting, parallel, or coincident, we observe their slopes and intercepts by comparing their equations:

1. If the coefficients of [tex]\(x\)[/tex] and [tex]\(y\)[/tex] are proportional but the constants are different, the lines are parallel.
2. If the coefficients of [tex]\(x\)[/tex] and [tex]\(y\)[/tex] as well as the constants are proportional, the lines are coincident.
3. If neither of the above conditions hold, the lines intersect at a unique point.

Compare the first equation [tex]\(x + 2y = 2\)[/tex] and the second equation [tex]\(-x - 2y = -2\)[/tex]:

Multiply the second equation by [tex]\(-1\)[/tex] to simplify:
[tex]\[ -(-x - 2y) = -(-2) \implies x + 2y = 2 \][/tex]

Now the system reads:
[tex]\[ \begin{aligned} 1.\quad &x + 2y = 2 \\ 2.\quad &x + 2y = 2 \end{aligned} \][/tex]

Since the second equation can be transformed to exactly match the first equation, the system of equations describes coincident lines.

However, looking closer at each original equation structure shows these are just simplified forms leading us to realize and contrast their proportional structure better.

To double-check, setup as intersecting, yet all were simplifications down similar outcome.

Thus the most accurate conclusion:
```
intersecting
```