Answer :
Let's carefully go through the steps given in the problem and discuss the correct order of reasons needed to complete the proof that RSTU is a square.
1. Statements: RSTU is a rectangle with vertices [tex]\(R(0,0)\)[/tex], [tex]\(S(0, a)\)[/tex], [tex]\(T(a, a)\)[/tex], and [tex]\(U(a,0)\)[/tex]
Reason: Given
2. Statements: [tex]\(RS = a\)[/tex] units
Reason: Given
3. Statements: [tex]\(ST = a\)[/tex] units
Reason: We need to use the distance formula to calculate the distance between points [tex]\(S\)[/tex] and [tex]\(T\)[/tex]. Therefore, the reason here should be the distance formula.
4. Statements: [tex]\(\overline{RS} \cong \overline{ST}\)[/tex]
Reason: The definition of congruence is that two segments are congruent if they have the same length. Here both [tex]\(RS\)[/tex] and [tex]\(ST\)[/tex] have lengths [tex]\(a\)[/tex].
5. Statements: RSTU is a square.
Reason: If two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it is a square. This follows from the properties of rectangles and squares.
Order of reasons:
- 3. distance formula: This is the reason used to determine that [tex]\(ST = a\)[/tex] units.
- 4. definition of congruence: This reason is used to state that two segments are congruent if they have the same measure.
- 5. If two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square: This is used to conclude that RSTU is a square.
So, the correct order of reasons that complete the proof is:
A. If two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square; distance formula; definition of congruence
This ensures that all logical steps are justified properly, proving that RSTU is a square.
1. Statements: RSTU is a rectangle with vertices [tex]\(R(0,0)\)[/tex], [tex]\(S(0, a)\)[/tex], [tex]\(T(a, a)\)[/tex], and [tex]\(U(a,0)\)[/tex]
Reason: Given
2. Statements: [tex]\(RS = a\)[/tex] units
Reason: Given
3. Statements: [tex]\(ST = a\)[/tex] units
Reason: We need to use the distance formula to calculate the distance between points [tex]\(S\)[/tex] and [tex]\(T\)[/tex]. Therefore, the reason here should be the distance formula.
4. Statements: [tex]\(\overline{RS} \cong \overline{ST}\)[/tex]
Reason: The definition of congruence is that two segments are congruent if they have the same length. Here both [tex]\(RS\)[/tex] and [tex]\(ST\)[/tex] have lengths [tex]\(a\)[/tex].
5. Statements: RSTU is a square.
Reason: If two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it is a square. This follows from the properties of rectangles and squares.
Order of reasons:
- 3. distance formula: This is the reason used to determine that [tex]\(ST = a\)[/tex] units.
- 4. definition of congruence: This reason is used to state that two segments are congruent if they have the same measure.
- 5. If two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square: This is used to conclude that RSTU is a square.
So, the correct order of reasons that complete the proof is:
A. If two consecutive sides of a rectangle are congruent, then it's a square; distance formula; definition of congruence
This ensures that all logical steps are justified properly, proving that RSTU is a square.