Answered

some extent make their own decisions. And although a
woman living in the city would never have had the same
freedom as a man, the difference between city life and
rural life for women was like the difference between night
and day.
Which sentence best evaluates the credibility of this historical argument?
OA. The historical argument is credible because it claims that women
had the most freedom during the Industrial Revolution.
B. The historical argument is credible because it includes a strong
claim and evidence from a credible source.
OC. The historical argument is not credible because it makes a claim
that is not believable.
OD. The historical argument is not credible because it does not nike a
claim about women during the Industrial Revolution.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer
The sentence that best evaluates the credibility of this historical argument is: B. The historical argument is credible because it includes a strong claim and evidence from a credible source. Here's why: 1. The sentence acknowledges the importance of having a strong claim in a historical argument. In this case, the argument discusses the differences in freedom between women living in the city and in rural areas during a particular historical period. 2. By mentioning evidence from a credible source, it highlights the significance of supporting arguments with reliable information. This helps establish the credibility of the argument by showing that it is based on factual evidence rather than mere speculation. 3. Credibility in historical arguments is often linked to the quality of the claim and the supporting evidence. Therefore, a historical argument that incorporates a strong claim supported by credible evidence is more likely to be considered reliable and trustworthy in the field of history.

Other Questions