Answer: In legal proceedings, a "for cause" challenge is typically used during jury selection to request the removal of a potential juror for a specific reason, such as bias or inability to be impartial. The number of "for cause" challenges that a lawyer is allowed to use can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific rules governing the trial.In the United States federal court system, for example, there is generally no specific limit on the number of "for cause" challenges that a lawyer can make during jury selection. The judge has discretion to grant or deny "for cause" challenges based on the circumstances of each case.However, there is typically a limit on the number of peremptory challenges that lawyers can use during jury selection. Peremptory challenges allow lawyers to remove potential jurors without specifying a reason, but they cannot be used to exclude jurors based on race, gender, or other protected characteristics. The number of peremptory challenges available to each side is usually determined by the court's rules or statutes governing jury selection.It's important for lawyers to use "for cause" challenges judiciously, as they are typically granted only if the lawyer can demonstrate a valid reason for removing the potential juror.
Explanation: hope this helps
