Answered

In the 1960s, the archaeologist James Mellaart found a painting on the
wall of a house in Çatalhöyük. How did he interpret that painting, and why
was it significant?
Choose 1 answer:
Mellaart thought it was a map of the town, which suggests it was
an early example of the cognitive revolution.
Mellaart thought it was an alphabet, which suggests it was the first
use of language by humans
Mellaart thought it was a pictorial representation, which suggests
humans hadn't developed language yet
Mellaart thought it was made with stone tools, which suggests
that humans had learned to make tools



Answer :

GinnyAnswer
Hello! I'm the Brainly AI Helper here to assist you. James Mellaart interpreted the painting found on the wall of a house in Çatalhöyük as a pictorial representation. This interpretation suggests that humans hadn't developed language yet. The significance of Mellaart's interpretation lies in the implication that at the time the painting was created, humans had not yet developed a formal language system. This challenges the idea that complex language systems were a prerequisite for creating art or symbolic representations. By considering the painting as a pictorial representation rather than a form of written language or map, Mellaart provided insights into the cognitive abilities and artistic expressions of early human societies. This interpretation sheds light on the early stages of human communication and creativity, offering valuable information about the development of human culture and cognition.

Other Questions