Answer :
Before developing an argument, scientists need to look at the validity of data, claims, hypotheses, and observations. This means that they should analyze the evidence they have collected, ensure that it is reliable and accurate, and evaluate if it supports the argument they are trying to make. By doing so, scientists can build a strong and convincing argument based on sound scientific principles.
In contrast, it is not advisable for scientists to rely solely on their opinion and personal views when developing an argument. While personal perspectives can influence how an argument is presented, scientific arguments should primarily be based on empirical evidence and logical reasoning rather than subjective beliefs.
Similarly, considering the arguments of famous people on the topic or choosing the arguments that make the most sense for society is not the primary focus when developing a scientific argument. Scientific arguments should be grounded in evidence, experimentation, and critical analysis to ensure that they are valid, reliable, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the scientific community.
Therefore, scientists should prioritize examining the validity of data, claims, hypotheses, and observations to develop well-supported and credible arguments that contribute to the scientific discourse and understanding of the natural world.
