Answer :
In the case of Kelo v. New London, the correct statement that explains why one side promotes the concept of personal responsibility is:
Kelo promotes this concept, because this would prevent New London from regulating and constraining her conduct "in matters of mere indifference, without any good end in view."
This statement highlights Kelo's stance in the case, emphasizing her desire to maintain control over her own property without unnecessary interference or restrictions from the government. By advocating for the protection of her property rights against unjust regulations, Kelo is asserting her sense of personal responsibility in managing her own affairs without undue external influence. This position aligns with the concept of personal responsibility as it pertains to individual autonomy and decision-making within legal boundaries.
This explanation showcases Kelo's perspective on the matter and how it relates to the concept of personal responsibility in the context of property rights and government intervention.
Kelo promotes this concept, because this would prevent New London from regulating and constraining her conduct "in matters of mere indifference, without any good end in view."
This statement highlights Kelo's stance in the case, emphasizing her desire to maintain control over her own property without unnecessary interference or restrictions from the government. By advocating for the protection of her property rights against unjust regulations, Kelo is asserting her sense of personal responsibility in managing her own affairs without undue external influence. This position aligns with the concept of personal responsibility as it pertains to individual autonomy and decision-making within legal boundaries.
This explanation showcases Kelo's perspective on the matter and how it relates to the concept of personal responsibility in the context of property rights and government intervention.