Answered

Which best describes the difference between the free-soil territories and those that had popular sovereignty?
OA. A territory that was free soil was closed to slavery, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery issue.
B.
○ C.
D.
○ E.
A territory that was free soil was open to slavery, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery issue.
A territory that had popular sovereignty was open to slavery, while one that was free soil was allowed to vote on the slavery issue.
A territory that had popular sovereignty was closed to slavery, while one that was free soil was allowed to vote on the slavery issue.
A territory that was free soil accepted the Homestead Act of 1862, while one that had popular sovereignty did not.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The difference is that free-soil territories did not allow slavery, while those with popular sovereignty enabled residents to decide the status of slavery through voting.


Explanation:

The difference between the free-soil territories and those that had popular sovereignty lies in their approach to slavery. A territory that was free soil was closed to slavery, while one that had popular sovereignty allowed the residents to determine the status of slavery through voting. On the other hand, a territory that had popular sovereignty meant that the residents could vote on the slavery issue themselves.


Learn more about Slavery in US territories here:

https://brainly.com/question/43406555


Other Questions