Answered

Dr. Simpson found a +.50 correlation between ice cream cone sales and violent
crimes in a community. Which of the following represents the best interpretation of
this result?
Multiple Choice
О
О
Ice cream causes people to become more violent and
aggressive.
Ice cream consumption is not related to violent crime.
A third variable, such as heat, may account for the
association between ice cream sales and violent crime.
Violent people like ice cream more than nonviolent
people.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

A +.50 correlation between ice cream sales and violent crimes does not indicate causation; a third variable likely influences both. Understanding the correlation-causation fallacy is crucial in interpreting such data.


Explanation:

A +.50 correlation between ice cream cone sales and violent crimes does not mean ice cream causes violence. The most plausible explanation is the presence of a third variable, such as heat, influencing both ice cream sales and crime rates. This demonstrates the correlation-causation fallacy where a correlation does not necessarily imply causation.


Learn more about Correlation and Causation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30912507