The Prince emphasizes the need for a conquering prince to destroy a former republic for control, illustrated by the Romans and Spartans. It highlights the significance of dismantling cities and preventing rebellion in conquered territories by using historical examples.
The Prince by Machiavelli argues that a conquering prince must destroy a former republic to hold it by dismantling cities, as exemplified by the Romans holding Capua, Carthage, and Numantia through this method. Additionally, the passage emphasizes how an conquered city accustomed to freedom will always rebel unless destroyed, using the failure of Spartans in Greece as an example. The portrayal of liberty as a rallying cry for rebellion in former republics further supports Machiavelli's argument.
https://brainly.com/question/1142956