Fishing: Shore or Boat?

Is fishing better from a boat or from the shore? Pyramid Lake is located on the Paiute Indian Reservation in Nevada. Presidents, movie stars, and people who just want to catch fish go to Pyramid Lake for really large cutthroat trout.

Let row [tex]$B$[/tex] represent hours per fish caught fishing from the shore, and let row [tex]$A$[/tex] represent hours per fish caught using a boat. The following data are paired by month from October through April (Source: Pyramid Lake Fisheries, Paiute Reservation, Nevada).

\begin{tabular}{l|ccccccc}
\hline & Oct. & Nov. & Dec. & Jan. & Feb. & March & April \\
\hline B: Shore & 1.6 & 1.8 & 2.0 & 3.2 & 3.9 & 3.6 & 3.3 \\
\hline A: Boat & 1.5 & 1.4 & 1.6 & 2.2 & 3.3 & 3.0 & 3.8 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

Use a [tex]$1\%$[/tex] level of significance to test if there is a difference in the population mean hours per fish caught using a boat compared with fishing from the shore.



Answer :

To determine if there is a significant difference in the population mean hours per fish caught using a boat compared to fishing from the shore at a 1% level of significance, we can conduct a paired t-test. Let's go through the process step-by-step:

### Step 1: State the Hypotheses
- Null Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]): The mean difference between the paired observations (hours per fish caught using a boat vs. shore) is zero. Mathematically, [tex]\( \mu_D = 0 \)[/tex].
- Alternative Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_1\)[/tex]): The mean difference between the paired observations is not zero. Mathematically, [tex]\( \mu_D \neq 0 \)[/tex].

### Step 2: Data Collection and Calculation
We have the following data on hours per fish caught:

- Shore (B): 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 3.2, 3.9, 3.6, 3.3
- Boat (A): 1.5, 1.4, 1.6, 2.2, 3.3, 3.0, 3.8

### Step 3: Perform the Paired t-test
To conduct the paired t-test, we calculate the t-statistic and the p-value to compare our sample data:

After performing these calculations, we obtain the following results:
- t-statistic: [tex]\( t = -2.083893572066533 \)[/tex]
- p-value: [tex]\( p = 0.08229037486734761 \)[/tex]

### Step 4: Compare the p-value with the Level of Significance
- Level of significance ([tex]\( \alpha \)[/tex]): 0.01

We compare the p-value to our significance level to determine if we should reject the null hypothesis.

### Step 5: Make the Decision
- If [tex]\( p \leq \alpha \)[/tex]: Reject [tex]\( H_0 \)[/tex]
- If [tex]\( p > \alpha \)[/tex]: Fail to reject [tex]\( H_0 \)[/tex]

Given that [tex]\( p = 0.08229 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \alpha = 0.01 \)[/tex]:

Since [tex]\( p > \alpha \)[/tex], we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

### Conclusion
At the 1% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the population mean hours per fish caught using a boat compared to fishing from the shore.