Answered

Question 6 (Multiple Choice Worth 2 points)

Which one of the following logical fallacies is based on insufficient or biased evidence?

A. Circular reasoning
B. Ad populum
C. Non sequitur
D. Hasty generalization



Answer :

Final answer:

Hasty generalization is a logical fallacy where conclusions are drawn from limited or biased evidence.


Explanation:

Hasty generalization is a logical fallacy that occurs when a conclusion is made based on insufficient or biased evidence. This fallacy often happens when too few examples are cited to support a general conclusion. For example, concluding that all students dislike a subject based on the opinions of just a few.


Learn more about Logical fallacies here:

https://brainly.com/question/29368484


Answer: D. Hasty generalization

Explanation:

A hasty generalization is a logical fallacy that is based on concluding with insufficient or biased evidence. Another way to phrase it is jumping to a conclusion without checking and making sure it is right first.