Answered

Question 1 of 10

Read this statement:
"Most people have no more desire to know the life history of their hamburger than they do their leather shoes."

In "A Culinary Wasteland," what argument made in Fast Food Nation is Crossen refuting with the statement above?

A. People would demand change in the fast-food industry if they could see behind the scenes.
B. Food before the advent of fast food was much more nutritious than it currently is today.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The refutation of the argument in Fast Food Nation is centered on transparency in the fast food industry and consumer influence on food choices.


Explanation:

Counterargument: In Crossen's refutation of the argument made in Fast Food Nation, the statement regarding people's lack of desire to know the life history of their hamburger contrasts the idea that people would demand change in the fast-food industry if they could see behind the scenes. This challenges the notion that greater transparency would lead to significant shifts in the industry.


Fast Food Industry Subsidization: Eric Schlosser in Fast Food Nation discusses how government subsidies have enabled the proliferation of unhealthy fast food, emphasizing the issue of overexposure to such foods among the general public.


Consumer Awareness and Influence: Tran's advocacy for an attitude shift towards sustainability in food choices aligns with the notion that consumer-driven demand for healthier options can positively impact the fast food industry's offerings, leading to potential improvements in the American diet.


Learn more about Fast Food Industry Issues here:

https://brainly.com/question/17069516


Other Questions